User-space prototype
Runnable Python runtime demonstrating HIR ร OAM concepts without claiming to be a bootable OS or kernel.
A public HIR/OAM compute architecture map for user-space runtime gates, audit chains, memory gates, CPU/GPU/SPU role separation, and bounded interface contracts.
This branch maps how HIR/OAM can become software-facing structure: HIR scoring, OAM fault detection, safety gates, audit logging, memory gates, CLI execution, and reviewable runtime outputs.
Runnable Python runtime demonstrating HIR ร OAM concepts without claiming to be a bootable OS or kernel.
Pressure-adjusted HIR/OAM state can produce reviewable gate states, not clinical or legal determinations.
Audit events are designed to preserve reviewability, tamper evidence, and provenance discipline.
Memory is framed as bounded, consent-aware, revocable, and audit-visible rather than an invisible capture layer.
Formal runtime foundation and compact kernel bridge connect pressure-form equations to implementation boundaries.
Runtime outputs remain architecture states, not validated decisions, diagnosis, treatment, legal conclusions, or compliance authority.
Main source target: Primordial_OS_Runtime_Prototype_v0.13.1_Terminology_Integrity_Patch.zip
The runtime packet contains source code, tests, examples, audit-log demo material, release documentation, limitation boundaries, and manifest metadata. This Space is a public landing map that points reviewers toward that evidence packet.
Upload all files in this packet to the Space root. The app file is index.html.
This is pre-validation architecture and a public review prototype.
It is not a bootable operating system, not a kernel, not production safety software, not clinical software, not a medical device, not legal software, not security certification, not compliance certification, and not a validated decision authority.
GREEN / YELLOW / RED outputs are architectural states only. They must not be treated as clinical, legal, employment, financial, policing, safety, or compliance determinations.
Structural correspondence, not ontological equivalence.